Fantastic Beasts: Secrets of Dumbledore Review: Correcting the Course of the Wizarding World

Among the disappointing reactions to the previous film, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwaldand the growing backlash against real-life characters involved in the franchise, which has led to a major character rework, the odds are certainly not in favor of Fantastic Beasts: Dumbledore’s Secrets gain acclaim. Being the halfway point in the planned five-movie series, the series’ fate certainly does not depend on the success of this film, as the Wizarding World has enough followers to ensure that this prequel narrative is completed, but Dumbledore’s secrets It could definitely kill off any interest among the crowd if it’s as disappointing as its predecessor. Fortunately, this movie managed to right the course of the story enough to get the characters excited and what the future might hold for them, even if it’s still a far cry from a proper movie success. Harry Potter series, because it invests more in its characters than its expected premise.

With the help of allies Credence (Ezra Miller) and Queenie (Alison Sudol), Grindelwald (Mads Mikkelsen) hopes to stage a play to gain political power in the wizarding community, and goes to great lengths to manipulate his future and those around him. Meanwhile, Dumbledore (Jude Law) is unable to fight Grindelwald directly, instead entrusting Newt (Eddie Redmayne), Newt’s brother Theseus (Callum Turner), and muggle Jacob (Dan Fogler) to stop his former love before it’s too late.

One of the biggest challenges a series of prequel films can face is balancing the stakes of a story. The first two films in Fantastic beasts The series has sparked a battle between wizards and wizards, and you’ll likely see those without mystical abilities being wiped out. However, given that we have seen in Harry Potter Films in which this plan did not work, it is difficult to invest in their outcome. It’s a relationship similar to the relationship between them the hobbit movies and the Lord of the Rings trilogy, while the original Star Wars trilogy focused on specific characters and how they dealt with an all-out war, allowing the previous trilogy to focus on characters over conflict. Dumbledore’s secrets They seem to be this path to success, as we spend more time deconstructing the layers of each character on the set rather than just exploring how the fate of the world hangs in the balance, who – shockingly – now sees us actually care about these characters.

It feels like a movie that gives us characters with layers that shouldn’t necessarily be worth celebrating, but given the one-dimensional and uninteresting all the characters have felt in previous installments, it comes as a shock to the actual investment in its outcome. Previously, they just felt like gears in a machine that were only needed to move the concession car forward, while Dumbledore’s secrets Finally it seems to have reassessed what it takes to meet the overall story, and that reassessment is actually paying off.

The key comes in correcting the film’s successful course within its first 15 minutes, once its title has been fully submitted. “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them” felt like a very specific title, although it fully factored in the outcome of that first movie, which led to some confusion among fans as to why the series would continue to use the “Fantastic Beasts” title. However, this third entry features a truly heartbreaking opening sequence in which Newt searches for a specific creature, a creature that goes into the overarching tale, while we see a variety of other monsters that connect to the plot over the rest of the story. Also in the film’s opening scenes, Dumbledore and Grindelwald share a conversation that helps inform the entire rest of the plot, which includes the earlier revelations of key aspects of his character. In other words, the masses are given both Fantastic beasts And the Dumbledore’s secrets In her opening scenes, she paved the way for the entire endeavor, while making the story even better for her.

As any Harry Potter fan can tell you, the arrival of each book or movie brought with it the introduction of new characters, many of which would not carry on into the next journey, inherently making it difficult to take an interest in characters that might prove to be irrelevant. Filmmakers behind Fantastic beasts She clearly identified the strengths and weaknesses of both the characters and the performers behind them, propelling Law’s Dumbledore and Turner’s Thisus to the fore in the service of the story, while Miller’s Credence and even Redmayne’s Newt have narrative momentum off their shoulders. Everyone feels used to their full potential and none of the characters feel arbitrary or forced into the spotlight, which also allows the other characters to fade more into the background and use them less.

Fans and non-fans alike will surely be curious to see how Mikkelsen’s performance compares to Johnny Depp’s interpretation of Grindelwald, with the narrative itself not addressing the wizard’s change of appearance. Whether you love or hate Depp’s performance, what works best for Mikkelsen is how subtle and subtle his interpretation is, reliant on quiet menace rather than exaggerated intimidation. Even Mikkelsen’s physical appearance in the film is a more accurate shot of the antagonist, indicating an effective transition from an actor’s performance of a character to the current actor.

While Dumbledore’s secrets He certainly is an effective revival of the series and a definitive improvement to what came before it, he had to pull himself out of this hole left by the previous installment, and he can only still be mediocre. For how much to correct itself, the film feels more like a prelude to these characters than the third entry in their journey, requiring audiences to re-learn the entire adventure, which is still lower stakes than seen in Harry Potter Franchise business. Seeing an entirely different era in history and events rooted in another world unfold means plenty of scenes that are low-lit or unsaturated, making for a visual palette that lacks charm and whims. These aesthetic choices certainly fit director David Yates’ work on the back half of Potter Franchise, but with Fantastic beastsThe cinematic style lacks the glamour audiences would have hoped to see in the series, with the characters themselves feeling quite flat like the sepia-toned 1920s.

The bar seems too low for Fantastic beasts A franchise that, even by being a harmless exploration of the magical world that moves relatively painlessly, feels like a victory, especially thanks to finding the right chemistry between all the characters to make the adventure feel natural. Throw in some direct contact with Hogwarts herself with an explanation of Dumbledore’s background, and you have what the best entry into this franchise so far, even if there’s still a lot of work to be done.

Rating: 3 out of 5

Fantastic Beasts: Dumbledore’s Secrets It hits theaters April 15th.

.

[ad_2]

Related posts

Leave a Comment